Book-3-Unit-5-Appendix-2-Understanding-the-Text-答案.doc
《Book-3-Unit-5-Appendix-2-Understanding-the-Text-答案.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Book-3-Unit-5-Appendix-2-Understanding-the-Text-答案.doc(4页珍藏版)》请在咨信网上搜索。
1、Understanding the TextUnit 5 When Help HurtsStep 1: Focus on Meaning1.1 Skimming: Read the passage quickly、 Pay special attention to the first several sentences of each paragraph、 Then, divide the passage into three parts and plete the following chart、 Part IMain IdeaPara、 1 to 3A terrible traffic a
2、ccident happened and one of the friends was seriously injured、 Para、 4 to 9The two friends were in court for three times、 Para、 10 The implication brought by the case、 1.2 Scanning: Read paragraphs 1 through 3 and answer the following questions orally without referring to the text、 1. What was the r
3、elationship between Lisa Torti and Alexandra Van Horn in 2003? They were close pals、 2. What did they do to celebrate Halloween, 2003? They went to a local club to dance and drink beer、 3. When did they leave the club that night? Did they take the same car? They left at 1:30 am、 They didnt take the
4、same car、 4. What happened after they left the club? The lead car knocked a light pole over and Van Horn couldnt get out、 5. How did Torti try to help Van Horn? What was the result? Torti yanked open the door and pulled Van Horn out、 The result was that Van Horn was paralyzed below the middle of her
5、 chest、 1、3 Skimming: Read paragraphs 4 through 9 and discuss the following concepts with your partner according to the cue words given below、The Opinion of Van Horn and Her AttorneyThe Opinion of Torti and Her AttorneyCourts DecisionThe Trial Court(45)1. A crazy situation2. Torti was “out of contro
6、l”3. Torti shouldnt have moved Van Horn1. Torti wasnt responsible2. Torti was protected by Good Samaritan statute、1、 Torti wasnt liable2、 The case should be dismissed、 The Appeals Court(68)1. Torti was not supplying urgent medical care2. she acted negligently、1. Torti was a brave soul2. Its unfair t
7、hat such a brave soul was not protected by law、Tortis helping Van Horn was not emergency medical care;The case shouldnt have been dismissed、 The Supreme Court(9)The appeals court was right; Sending the case back to the trial court to decide whether Torti acted with “due care”、 Final ResultTorti sett
8、led the case out of court for a “significant amount”、 1、4 Read and think: Read the last paragraph and reflect on the entire text、 Discuss the following questions with your partner、 1、 What can you infer from the last paragraph? 2、 If you were Torti, would you have dragged Van Horn out of the car tha
9、t night? Why or why not?3、 Why do you think Van Horn filed a lawsuit against her close friend? If you were Van Horn, would you file a lawsuit as well? Why or why not?4、 Do you think Torti was acting with “due care” and providing emergency medical care when rescuing Van Horn? Was the result of the ca
10、se fair to both of them?Step 2: Focus on Language2.1 Sentence translation* As the lead car wound around a curve, its driver lost control, and the vehicle plowed into a light pole at 45 mph, knocking it over、 (para、1) 领头得英菲尼迪轿车在拐弯时,司机失控,汽车以时速四十五英里得速度撞到了路边得电灯杆上。* Most people wont sue a person who trie
11、d to help them unless its a crazy situation, says Robert Hutchinson, Van Horns attorney、 (para、4) 范霍恩得律师罗伯特哈钦森说:“大多数人不会起诉想帮助自己得人,除非情况非比寻常。”* In any event, everyone knows you shouldnt move a person with a potential neck or back injury, Hutchinson says、 The claim? Negligence、 (para、4) 不管怎样,“人人都知道不应该移动
12、一个脖子或后背可能已受伤得人”,哈钦森说。起诉得理由就是什么呢?过失伤害。* Indeed, the Good Samaritan statute in the California Health and Safety Code states that anyone who provides care in good faith to another person in an emergency cant be liable for civil damages、 (para、5) 确实,在加利福尼亚州健康与安全问题相关法律中,见义勇为条例规定,在紧急情况下,凡出于善意对她人施以救护者,不应承担
13、任何民事赔偿责任。* And in accordance with the mon lawor law based on precedents set by similar cases in the pastGood Samaritan doctrine protects only those who do not act negligently under the circumstances、 (para、6) 根据普通法即根据以往类似案件得判例所设定得法律见义勇为法只保护在紧急情况下实施救助且无过失者。* The mon wisdom on the issue was clear: A p
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Book Unit Appendix Understanding the Text 答案
1、咨信平台为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,收益归上传人(含作者)所有;本站仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。所展示的作品文档包括内容和图片全部来源于网络用户和作者上传投稿,我们不确定上传用户享有完全著作权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果侵犯了您的版权、权益或隐私,请联系我们,核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
2、文档的总页数、文档格式和文档大小以系统显示为准(内容中显示的页数不一定正确),网站客服只以系统显示的页数、文件格式、文档大小作为仲裁依据,个别因单元格分列造成显示页码不一将协商解决,平台无法对文档的真实性、完整性、权威性、准确性、专业性及其观点立场做任何保证或承诺,下载前须认真查看,确认无误后再购买,务必慎重购买;若有违法违纪将进行移交司法处理,若涉侵权平台将进行基本处罚并下架。
3、本站所有内容均由用户上传,付费前请自行鉴别,如您付费,意味着您已接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不进行额外附加服务,虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(未进行购买下载可退充值款),文档一经付费(服务费)、不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
4、如你看到网页展示的文档有www.zixin.com.cn水印,是因预览和防盗链等技术需要对页面进行转换压缩成图而已,我们并不对上传的文档进行任何编辑或修改,文档下载后都不会有水印标识(原文档上传前个别存留的除外),下载后原文更清晰;试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓;PPT和DOC文档可被视为“模板”,允许上传人保留章节、目录结构的情况下删减部份的内容;PDF文档不管是原文档转换或图片扫描而得,本站不作要求视为允许,下载前自行私信或留言给上传者【快乐****生活】。
5、本文档所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用;网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽--等)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
6、文档遇到问题,请及时私信或留言给本站上传会员【快乐****生活】,需本站解决可联系【 微信客服】、【 QQ客服】,若有其他问题请点击或扫码反馈【 服务填表】;文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“【 版权申诉】”(推荐),意见反馈和侵权处理邮箱:1219186828@qq.com;也可以拔打客服电话:4008-655-100;投诉/维权电话:4009-655-100。
链接地址:https://www.zixin.com.cn/doc/4410731.html