英语歧义的语用研究-—英语论文-毕业论文.doc
《英语歧义的语用研究-—英语论文-毕业论文.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英语歧义的语用研究-—英语论文-毕业论文.doc(39页珍藏版)》请在咨信网上搜索。
1、 本科生毕业论文册 学院 XXX学院 专业 英语翻译 班级 XXXXX机器翻译班 学生 XXX 指导教师 XXX XXXX大学本科毕业论文(设计)任务书编 号: 论文(设计)题目: 英语歧义的语用研究 学 院: XXX学院 专业: 英语翻译 班级: XXXX机器翻译班 学生姓名: XXX 学号: XXXXX 指导教师: XXX 职称: 副教授 1、 论文(设计)研究目标及主要任务本论文的研究目标是从语用学的角度探讨英语歧义的形成原因及其在交际中的应用。其主要任务是通过分析英语歧义的形成原因指导其在交际中的运用。2、 论文(设计)的主要内容 本论文分为三章,第一章从合作原则和会话准则的角度分析英
2、语歧义的产生原因,第二章从言语行为理论的角度分析英语歧义的产生原因,最后一章讨论了英语歧义的应用。3、 论文(设计)的基础条件及研究路线本论文的基础条件是不同的语言学家对语用歧义的研究结果。研究路线是对英语歧义的产生原因从不同的因素角度进行详细的阐述,并将其分别应用在日常生活交际中。4、 主要参考文献Hu, Zhuanglin.2006. Linguistics: A Course Book (3rd edition). Beijing: Peking University Press.J. L. Austin. How to Do Things with Words. Beijing: Fo
3、reign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2002.Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Inc.何兆熊,新编语用学概要. 上海:上海外语外语教育出版社, 2000.邱述德,英语歧义. 北京:商务印书馆, 1998.5、 计划进度阶段起止日期1确定初步论文题目 3月16日前2与导师见面,确定大致范围,填开题报告和任务书,导师签字3月16日-3月23日3提交论文提纲3月23日-3月30日4交初稿和文献综述3月30日-4月20日5交终稿和评议书5月8号前指 导 教师: 年
4、 月 日教研室主任: 年 月 日注:一式三份,学院(系)、指导教师、学生各一份XXXX大学本科生毕业论文(设计)开题报告书 XXX 学院 英语机器翻译 专业 XXX 届学生姓名XXX论文(设计)题目英语歧义的语用研究指导教师XXX专业职称XXX所属教研室英语基础教研室研究方向语言学课题论证:从合作原则和会话准则,以及言语行为理论两方面论证英语语用歧义的形成原因及其在交际中的应用。方案设计:第一章从合作原则和会话准则的角度分析英语歧义的产生原因,第二章从言语行为理论的角度分析英语歧义的产生原因,第三章探讨英语歧义的应用。进度计划:3月16日前确定初步论文题目 3月23日前写开题报告、任务书3月3
5、0日前提交论文提纲4月20日前提交初稿和文献综述5月8日前提交终稿和评议书指导教师意见: 指导教师签名: 年 月 日教研室意见: 教研室主任签名: 年 月 日XXXX大学本科生毕业论文(设计)评议书姓 名XXX学院XXX学院专业机器翻译年级(班)XXX英语机器翻译班论 文 题 目英语歧义的语用研究完成时间2013/5/8论文内容摘要歧义是语言使用中经常出现的现象,包括语音歧义,词汇歧义,语法歧义等。近年来,对歧义的研究不断深入,除了语言平面的静态研究,也开始了对歧义的动态研究,即在语用学范围内对歧义进行研究。语用歧义指说话人在特定语境或上下文中使用不确定的、模糊的或间接的话语向听话人同时表达数
6、种言外行为或言外之力的现象。目前,此类研究仍需进一步深入,本文主要从语用学的角度运用合作原则、会话准则和言语行为理论对歧义现象加以分析,对语用歧义的产生原因进行了归纳。语用歧义通常会给交流带来不便,但如果使用得当,巧妙利用语用歧义,则可以在交际中发挥奇特的作用,例如表达言外之意,产生幽默效果,避免冲突等。本文将原理和大量例句相结合,从语用学的角度对歧义的产生原因及其应用进行了详细的分析。指导教师评语 年 月 日指 导 教 师职称初评成绩答辩小组姓名职称教研室组长成员答辩记录: 记录人签字: 年 月 日答辩小组意见: 组长签字: 年 月 日学院意见: 评定成绩: 签章 年 月 日 XXXX大学本
7、科生毕业论文(设计)文献综述Literature ReviewThe study of pragmatic ambiguity has a long history. Ambiguity is a phenomenon that often appears in language use. Ambiguity includes phonological ambiguity, lexical ambiguity, and grammatical ambiguity. In recent years, the research of ambiguity goes deeper and deeper
8、, besides the static study in linguistic level, the dynamic study has also begun, and that is pragmatic study of ambiguity. Pragmatic ambiguity refers to the phenomenon that speakers use unsure, ambiguous or indirect utterance to express several illocutionary acts or illocutionary forces to hearers
9、in a specific context or text. At present, this field needs further research. Pragmatic ambiguity arises when the statement is not specific, and the context does not provide enough information needed to clarify the statement (Walton 1996).Information is missing, and must be inferred.All languages de
10、pend on words and sentences in constructing meaning. However, one of the fundamental facts about words and sentences is that many of them in our languages have more than one meaning. Linguist Wilhelm von Humboldt said in 18th century that language is infinite use of finite means and it is a creative
11、 activity (Robin, 1987). So ambiguity may occur when an utterance can be understood in two or more distinct senses. Kess and Hoppe even say in Ambiguity in Psycholinguistics, “upon careful consideration, one cannot but be amazed at the ubiquity in language.” English, as a language has no exception t
12、o it. Since Ambiguity is not a new topic, a lot of researches have been made in this field. In the west, ambiguity can be traces back to the sophism of ancient Greek philosophy. However, previous researches are mainly concerned with phonological ambiguity, lexical ambiguity and grammatical ambiguity
13、. But the word pragmatics was first put forward in 1930s by Charles Morris and the category of pragmatic ambiguity was not explored until the 1970s. So researches on pragmatic ambiguity are still insufficiently thorough, for example, its definition, characteristics, category, functions and understan
14、ding still need further study. Based upon the previous researches, I will further explore the forming factors of pragmatic ambiguity and talk about its applications. The notion of meaning is a very important idea in the field of semantics. G. Leech recognizes seven kinds of meaning in his booksemant
15、ics, which was first published in 1974. Leech (1981) put forwards three kinds of meanings according to Hallidays systemic-functional perspective: conceptual meaning, associative meaning and thematic meaning. The associative meaning includes connotative meaning, social meaning, affective meaning, ref
16、lected meaning and collocative meaning.In the study of pragmatics, meaning and context are its two basic concepts. The meaning in pragmatics refers to the specific meaning in actual use in a particular context. Context is the environment in which speech communication takes place, which consists of a
17、 series of subjective and objective elements closely related to language communication. Elements of context include the utterance itself, the behavior environment and situation where speech act happens, common sense and the relationship between communication participants.The theory of conversational
18、 implicature was proposed by an Oxford philosopher Herbert Paul Grice. In real communication, the intention of the speaker is often not the literal meaning of what he says; the real intention implied in the words is called conversational impicature. Conversational implicature is a kind of implied me
19、aning, which is deduced based on the conventional meaning of words as well as context, under the guidance of the Cooperative Principle and its maxims. From this perspective, implicature is comparable to illocutionary force in speech act theory because they are both related to the contextual side of
20、meaning. The difference between these two theories is that they offer different mechanisms to explain the generation of contextual meaning. At the end of Grices “Logic and Convention”, he mentioned a variety of characteristics of implicature. (1) Calculability (2) Cancellability (3) Non-detachabilit
21、y (4) Non-conventionality. Grice also proposed the Cooperative Principle: Make your conversational contribution such as is required, at the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or direction of the talk exchange in which you are engaged. To specify the Cooperative Principle further, Gric
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 英语 歧义 研究 英语论文 毕业论文
1、咨信平台为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,收益归上传人(含作者)所有;本站仅是提供信息存储空间和展示预览,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容不做任何修改或编辑。所展示的作品文档包括内容和图片全部来源于网络用户和作者上传投稿,我们不确定上传用户享有完全著作权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果侵犯了您的版权、权益或隐私,请联系我们,核实后会尽快下架及时删除,并可随时和客服了解处理情况,尊重保护知识产权我们共同努力。
2、文档的总页数、文档格式和文档大小以系统显示为准(内容中显示的页数不一定正确),网站客服只以系统显示的页数、文件格式、文档大小作为仲裁依据,平台无法对文档的真实性、完整性、权威性、准确性、专业性及其观点立场做任何保证或承诺,下载前须认真查看,确认无误后再购买,务必慎重购买;若有违法违纪将进行移交司法处理,若涉侵权平台将进行基本处罚并下架。
3、本站所有内容均由用户上传,付费前请自行鉴别,如您付费,意味着您已接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不进行额外附加服务,虚拟产品一经售出概不退款(未进行购买下载可退充值款),文档一经付费(服务费)、不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
4、如你看到网页展示的文档有www.zixin.com.cn水印,是因预览和防盗链等技术需要对页面进行转换压缩成图而已,我们并不对上传的文档进行任何编辑或修改,文档下载后都不会有水印标识(原文档上传前个别存留的除外),下载后原文更清晰;试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓;PPT和DOC文档可被视为“模板”,允许上传人保留章节、目录结构的情况下删减部份的内容;PDF文档不管是原文档转换或图片扫描而得,本站不作要求视为允许,下载前自行私信或留言给上传者【可****】。
5、本文档所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用;网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽--等)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。
6、文档遇到问题,请及时私信或留言给本站上传会员【可****】,需本站解决可联系【 微信客服】、【 QQ客服】,若有其他问题请点击或扫码反馈【 服务填表】;文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“【 版权申诉】”(推荐),意见反馈和侵权处理邮箱:1219186828@qq.com;也可以拔打客服电话:4008-655-100;投诉/维权电话:4009-655-100。