非货币性X交易的会计处理外文翻译及原文.doc

外文文献翻译原文：Accounting for Nonmonetary ExchangesBusinesses use nonmonetary exchanges for a variety of reasons. These range from routine trade-ins of old equipment to sophisticated exchanges of real estate. In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, which preserves the fundamental principle that the accounting for nonmonetary transactions should be based on the fair values of the assets exchanged. Accordingly, a nonmonetary asset received in a reciprocal exchange should be recorded using the fair value of the asset relinquished, or the value of the asset received if it is more clearly evident.Since 1973, APBO 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, permitted an exception to this fair value principle for exchanges involving similar productive assets. Such exchanges were generally measured and recognized by reference to the book value of the assets relinquished. SFAS 153 eliminates that exception, but introduces a new exception for exchanges that lack commercial substance. (APBO 29 also addressed other types of nonmonetary transactions, including nonreciprocal transfers with owners-e.g., dividends in-kind; or other parties-e.g., in-kind charitable contributions. These transactions were not impacted by SFAS 153.) This standard was issued as part of the short-term convergence project with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). In fact, FASB largely adopted the revisions previously made to IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment.Implementing SFAS 153 requires an understanding of the term commercial substance and how this concept introduces a unique element of subjectivity to the accounting for nonmonetary transactions. Given the lack of implementation guidance in SFAS 153, specific illustrations are provided below and contrasted with prior practice. The authors believe that SFAS 153 not only presents a number of interesting and challenging issues, it also introduces elements of professional judgment that are likely to recur in future standards.Underlying Concepts and Changes in Practice Under APBO 29 (para. 3c), an exchange was defined as a reciprocal transfer whereby an entity accepts an asset or service (or satisfies a liability) by relinquishing another asset, providing a service, or incurring another obligation. SFAS 153 (para. 2a) amends this definition of exchange by requiring the transferor to relinquish the usual risks and rewards of the asset and have no substantial continuing involvement therein. APBO 29 also focused on the attributes of the assets exchanged (i.e., similar or dissimilar) to determine the basis for measurement and recognition of any associated gain or loss on the transaction. A reciprocal exchange involving similar productive assets was generally recorded using the book value of the transferred asset similar productive assets are of the same general type, that perform the same function or that are employed in the same line of business (APBO 29, par 3e).Many accountants asserted, and FASB agreed, that assessing the similarity of assets exchanged could be overly subjective and difficult to apply in practice. This contention existed despite the exhaustive guidance available in EITF Issues 98-3, Determining Whether a Nonmonetary Transaction Involves Receipt of Productive Assets or of a Business, and 01-2, Interpretations of APB Opinion No. 29.For more than 30 years, the fair value exception for similar productive assets was supported by the following reasoning:* The earnings process was not complete when such exchanges transpired.* Revenue should be recognized from the sale of goods and services emanating from the production process, not by the mere substitution of productive assets.* The entity was often in substantially the same economic position after the exchange.* The use of fair values could result in the arbitrary recognition of gains.This exception permitted a number of nonmonetary exchanges to be recorded at book value despite the fact that the transactions may have significantly changed the economic position of the reporting entity. In SFAS 153, FASB concluded that the recognition and measurement principles applicable to these transactions are better viewed by evaluating changes to the economics of the reporting entity (commercial substance). This approach was deemed preferable to the subjective evaluation of the similarity of assets and the timing of the earnings process.Scope and Applicability SFAS 153 is applicable to nonmonetary exchanges occurring after June 15, 2005. Certain transactions are specifically excluded from its scope:* business combinations;* nonmonetary exchanges of assets between entities under common control;* nonmonetary assets (or services) acquired in exchange for the reporting entitys common stock;* stock dividends and splits;* a transfer of assets in exchange for an equity interest in that entity;* transfers of financial assets; and* certain transactions by oil and gas producers.SFAS 153 also amends the scope of SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, to include exchanges of equity-method investments for similar productive assets.During its deliberations over SFAS 153 (para. A20), FASB considered amending the scope of SFAS 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, to also include exchanges of real estate. FASB later decided that accounting guidance for reciprocal exchanges of real estate would remain within the scope of APBO 29.A New Focus on Commercial Substance SFAS 153 requires that nonmonetary exchanges be recorded using the book value of the asset relinquished (after a reduction for impairment, if applicable) if one of the following three conditions applies:* The fair value of the asset relinquished or received cannot be determined (within reasonable limits).* There is an exchange of inventory for inventory that will be sold in the same line of business to facilitate sales to customers.* The transaction lacks commercial substance.The first two conditions are essentially unchanged from APBO 29. The third condition replaces the prior exception for similar productive assets.Commercial substance is a new concept in U.S. GAAP and presents unique, subjective challenges for practitioners. Unfortunately, FASB did not specifically define this term. The concept focuses on the business purpose or rationale of the exchange, and requires an examination of changes in the entitys economic position as a result of the transaction. Essentially, commercial substance exists if the entitys future cash flows are expected to significantly change as a result of the exchange (para. 2d). FASB believes that cash flow tests provide objective evidence of the business purpose of the transaction, even though the existence of commercial substance and the underlying assumptions are determined by its management.Commercial substance is deemed to exist if either of the following conditions is present (para 2d):* The configuration of the future cash flows related to the asset received is expected to be significantly different from that of the asset transferred. Configuration relates to the risk, timing, and amount of cash flows.* The entity-specific value of the asset received differs from the entity-specific value of the asset transferred, and this difference is significant when compared to the fair values of the assets exchanged.Though the determination of commercial substance suggests the need for detailed calculations, FASB indicates that a qualitative assessment may be all that is required.The term entity-specific value is relatively new to FASB standards, though it was introduced as part of the conceptual framework in Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts 7, Using Cash Flow Information and Present Value in Accounting Measurements. Essentially, it represents the present value of the entitys expected future cash flows from the use and disposition of the asset. Entity-specific value differs from fair value, because it reflects the entitys expectations as to the amounts, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows versus those assumed by others in the marketplace.The factors that management should consider when determining an assets entity-specific value have been broadly interpreted. These include the manner in which the asset is integrated with the entitys operations as well as the synergies expected as a result of the exchange. The minutes of FASBs April 22, 2003, meeting indicate that changes in entity-specific value can be assessed with and without the inbound asset.Illustrations: SFAS 153 Versus Prior Practice Many respondents to the exposure draft of SFAS 153 requested that FASB provide illustrations or implementation guidance, particularly with respect to the new commercial substance provisions. It declined, however, to provide such guidance (para. A12) because it believes that the additional guidance related to commercial substance sufficiently clarifies the meaning of that term. FASB was also concerned that such examples might be viewed as bright lines by accountants.The authors informal discussions with practitioners and accounting educators suggest the need for added clarity concerning the new concepts and the subjectivity introduced in SFAS 153. Accordingly, Exhibits 1 (Trade-in of Equipment), 2 (Exchange of Equipment), and 3 (Exchange of Real Property) highlight key provisions in SFAS 153 and contrast them with prior practice.Remember that gains and losses on exchanges of similar productive assets are still deferred for tax purposes under IRC section 1031 (a). Accordingly, temporary differences and deferred tax consequences will arise if commercial substance exists.What about boot? In general, SFAS 153 retains the measurement and recognition concepts in APBO 29 in cases where boot (i.e., monetary consideration) is paid or received. Exhibits 1 and 2 include situations where boot is paid in an otherwise nonmonetary exchange. The consensus in Issue 8(a) of EITF 01-02, Interpretations of APB Opinion No. 29, also remains unchanged. In other words, nonmonetary exchanges that involve significant boot, defined as 25% or more of the fair value of the exchange, are deemed to be monetary. Indeed, both parties should record these exchanges at fair value and recognize all gains or losses accordingly.Disclosure. SFAS 153 did not change the disclosure requirements under para. 28 of APBO 29. Accordingly, the following information regarding nonmonetary exchanges must still be disclosed:* The nature of the transaction;* The basis of accounting for the assets transferred; and* The amount of gain or loss recognized during the period.Future Implications This article summarizes and illustrates the salient aspects of SFAS 153 and the associated implications for accounting practice. A close examination of the standard, however, reveals that the subjectivity inherent in assessing commercial substance could result in inconsistent application of SFAS 153s provisions. FASB is expected to use the commercial substance concept in future accounting standards. Accordingly, the authors recommend that FASB consider providing additional guidance on how accountants should implement this concept in the future.EXHIBIT 1 Trade-in of Equipment (Plus Boot): Commercial Substance-Change in Configuration of Future Cash Flows Spirit Wineries, Inc., owns several crusher-destemmer machines used to peel, press, and extract juice from grapes during harvest. One of the large-capacity units, though operating well, is oversized for the current facility and less efficient than desired. This unit originally cost $100,000 and has accumulated depreciation of $40,000. Its fair value is $70,000, an amount quoted by an independent dealer. Spirit purchases a new model, costing $90,000, by trading in its existing unit and paying cash of $20,000.AnalysisPrior GAAP. Under APBO 29, this transaction would represent an exchange of similar productive assets. Accordingly, the gain of $10,000 (fair value of $70,000 less net book value of $60,000) would be deferred, and the new crusher would be recorded at $60,000 (net book value of $60,000 plus boot paid of $20,000). The following journal entry illustrates this exchange:Dr. Equipment, New $80,000Dr. Accumulated Depreciation, Old 40,000 Dr. Equipment, Old $100,000 Cr. Cash 20,000SFAS 153. Under SFAS 153, Spirit must assess whether the exchange has commercial substance. Accordingly, Spirit examines whether there will be a significant change in the configuration of future cash flows. Though SFAS 153 does not require a detailed quantitative analysis, management examines the risk, timing, and amount of cash flows as part of its capital budgeting process. The analysis reveals that the change in the amount and timing from the upfront cash payment, coupled with projected higher throughput and lower processing costs from the new unit, will likely have a significant economic impact. Spirit concludes that the transaction has commercial substance.Spirit will record the new equipment at its fair value of $90,000 and recognize the gain of $10,000 on the trade-in of the old equipment The journal entry is as follows:Dr. Equipment, New $90,000Dr. Accumulated Depreciation, Old 40,000 Cr. Equipment, Old $100,000 Cr. Cash 20,000 Cr. Gain on Exchange 10,000Compared with APBO 29, the commercial substance approach under SFAS 153 results in a higher asset valuation and a recognized gain of $10,000. For tax purposes, Spirit would not recognize any gain on this transaction. Spirit will, however, have a deferred tax liability under SFAS 109.Source:Fornaro James M., Buttermilch Rita J.,Biondo John. Accounting for Nonmonetary ExchangesJ.CPA Journal, Feb2008, Vol. 78 Issue 2:38-41.译文：非货币性交易的会计处理 企业利用非货币交易的原因有很多，包括日常的旧设备的以旧换新以及复杂的不动产的交换。2004年12月，FASB发布财务会计准则公告第153号非货币性资产交换（FASB 153），并对APB意见书第29号非货币性交易进行修订，它保留了基本原则，即对非货币性交换的会计处理仍以交换资产的公允价值为计价基础。因此，在一项非货币性资产交易中应以换出资产的公允价值作为换入资产的入账价值，但如果所收到资产的公允价值比换出资产的公允价值更加明显，则应以所收到的资产的公允价值计量成本。1973年，美国会计原则委员会（APB）发布的会计原则委员会意见书第29号一一非货币性交易会计，其中以公允价值为计价基础涉及同类生产性资产可以例外。这样交换要求被放弃的资产的账面价值可计量并且确认。SFAS第153号消除了异常，但在交换中引入了一个新的异常“商业实质”。（APB意见书第29号还涉及其他类型的非货币性交易，其中包括与所有者的非互惠性转让，如向股东发放股票股利，与所有者之外的企业进行的非互惠性转让，如企业将非货币性资产捐赠给慈善组织、政府将土地等划拨给企业等。这些交易不会受到影响而SFAS第153号。本标准是作为与国际会计准则委员会的短期趋同项目的一部分发行。事实上，大部分采用财务会计准则委员会先前作出的IAS 16，物业，厂房及设备的修改。）实施SFAS第153号要求对“商业实质”以及这一概念引入了独特的主观元素的非货币交易的有会计理解。由于SFAS第153号的实施缺乏指导，下面提供了具体的插图，并与之前的做法作了对比。笔者认为，SFAS第153号不仅全面展现了有趣的和富有挑战性的一些问题，并介绍了专业的判断，很可能会再次出现在未来的标准元素。一、目前的相关概念与变迁根据APB意见书第29号（第3C）的，一次“交易”的定义是一个实体的相互转移，即为了接受另一种资产或服务（或满足负债）而提供服务，或者